♡ 43 ( +1 | -1 ) you got it wronglike bluebabygirl said 1.e4 is an attacking move, 1.d4 is more positional, that means that you don't mean on crushing your oponent with a kingside attack, but by, lets say, weaking his Q's side and winning something like a Pawn. Although there are some real attacking variations, like the Samisch against the KID, or 4.f3 against the Nimzo, there are generally less recomenable than the Rauzer or the English attack.
♡ 37 ( +1 | -1 ) Damn...Here is a game that I was white and got my butt kicked by a more advanced player. This opening really game me trouble, I'll post the whole game below: 1. d4 f5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 4. e3 Bg7 5. Bd3 O-O 6. e4 fxe4 7. Nxe4 Nxe4 8. Bxe4 d5 9. Bd3 c5 10. O-O cxd4 11. Bf4 Rxf4 12. Qd2 Qd6 13. g3 Rxf3 14. Rf-e1 Nc6 15. Re2 e5 16. c3 e4 17. Bb5 dxc3 18. bxc3 Bxc3
Hope everyone enjoys watching me being totally detroyed! It was delightful for me!
♡ 16 ( +1 | -1 ) 6. e4 way to agressive. Opening up the board when opponent is castled and you are not is not the best choice =/. You should have been castleing and developing your dark bishop.
♡ 6 ( +1 | -1 ) Blackmar-Diemer-Gambit...is a sharp opening: 1.d4 d5 2.e4 de 3.f3, leading to many adventurous combinations.
♡ 6 ( +1 | -1 ) IronhorseI KNOW! In retrospect it is so easy to see...thanks for rubbing it in :)
♡ 16 ( +1 | -1 ) pycroft, your opponent played the black side of the leningrad variation: